Welcome to Maxi-Pedia Forum. Maxi-Pedia discussion forum is a free community inviting you to express your ideas and discuss various topics with other contributors.

December 06, 2024, 05:30:54 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Most Recent Posts:
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author
Topic: 

Software or hardware encryption?

 (Read 15037 times)
ramki
Semi-Newbie
*
Posts: 31


« on: March 17, 2010, 07:57:37 am »

Which is better? Software (Pointsec, Truecrypt, Bitlocker) or hardware (Seagate) encryption?
Logged
Maxi-Pedia Forum
« on: March 17, 2010, 07:57:37 am »

 Logged
bugibar
Full Member
***
Posts: 107


« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2010, 02:38:53 pm »

Depends on what you want to achieve. Protection against loss of data when your computer gets stolen, or protection against data loss when the computer is running?
Logged
ramki
Semi-Newbie
*
Posts: 31


« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2010, 08:27:14 am »

What difference does it make? I want to be sure that if the laptop is stolen, nobody can access the data.
Logged
bugibar
Full Member
***
Posts: 107


« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2010, 10:57:25 am »

In this case, I would go with hardware encryption. The biggest advantage of hw hdd encryption is that you do not have to worry about any software running in the background. Hw hdd encryption protects against accessing the data from the power-off state, and it is probably the strongest form of protection now, but once the computer is running, it provides no protection at all (for example against network attacks).
Logged
ramki
Semi-Newbie
*
Posts: 31


« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2010, 12:02:07 pm »

So, when I have a self encrypting hard drive, it provides no protection for LAN attacks?
Logged
Pansophic
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 50


« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2011, 06:54:55 pm »

i think truecrypt is better Smiley
Logged
Maxi-Pedia Forum
   

 Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.379 seconds with 21 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)