Welcome to Maxi-Pedia Forum. Maxi-Pedia discussion forum is a free community inviting you to express your ideas and discuss various topics with other contributors.

October 23, 2021, 06:22:30 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Most Recent Posts:
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author
Topic: 

Whom to blame for the financial mess - bank management or stock holders?

 (Read 7422 times)
bugibar
Full Member
***
Posts: 107


« on: November 17, 2008, 01:46:06 pm »

Whom should we blame for the downfall and failure of the US financial system (mainly banks)?

Is it the management in those banks (greedy CEOs, CFOs, and those guys)

or

greedy shareholders who just keep wanting more and more profit?

Bank management - lack of oversight and regulation, taking away a lot of money in bonuses? Shareholders - they are just greedy and pushing the banks to extreme measures and negligence of risk?
Logged
Maxi-Pedia Forum
« on: November 17, 2008, 01:46:06 pm »

 Logged
pawel
Semi-Newbie
*
Posts: 42


« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2008, 01:52:52 pm »

I would definitely blame both. If a CEO is stupid and looses money why should he get a bonus at the end of the year??!!
Logged
atari
Moderator
*****
Posts: 121


« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2008, 09:10:36 pm »

Had shareholders been not so greedy, banks would not need to get into so risky deals and would be able to satisfy shareholders with some decent return.

This is the model that was in place for some time, and everything was working fine. Shareholders were happy, bank management was happy too, and treasury and other departments looked like geniuses. And investors? They were looking at accelerating returns in the PAST and requested at least the same return down the road. That is where the problem started.

Accelerating growth in return is not possible with constant riskiness of investments, so banks had to undergo more risk. Is it possible for banks to have return 10-20% when the economy grows at only 3-4%? In the long term NO. Increased risk was the price for the return acceleration.

Did the investors know about this? The small guys like average Joe probably did not realize this. Everything looked so nice at the first sight. And the big guys - they were hoping that the allmighty FED will take over the risks. And, unfortunately it looks like FED did not have all the risks under control.

Here is a good book on this:
  http://www.amazon.com/Black-Swan-Impact-Highly-Improbable/dp/1400063515/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1

Logged
Maxi-Pedia Forum
   

 Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Page created in 0.171 seconds with 34 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)